It’s long time I haven’t been posting here. Just quick update, excluding private conferences where I gave a few talks (which I can’t mention), last time I was a speaker on some known conferences:
– Security B-Sides in Warsaw 2014 (as anonymous speaker). I was talking about attacks on modern x86/x64 architecture (like TLB-splitting, virtualization, AMT, etc.). Conference has warm and homely atmosphere which helps to integrate every attendee. This is rare opportunity in modern industrial IT sec world…
– Secure 2014. Each year conference is more and more well-known and famous. CERT Poland (organizer) strives to keep high value of his baby and every year invites most skilled speakers. This year (2014) I had a chance to gave an official talk on behalf of the Microsoft: “The exploitation arm race between attackers and defenders”. I’ve received massive positive feedback which is for me the largest acknowledgements of my work. Conference is very professional and prepared down to the last detail.
I was heavily playing with Stack Smashing Protector a few years ago. Some of my research (observation) I decided to publish on phrack magazine but not everything. Two years ago my professional life moved to the Windows environment and unfortunately I didn’t have time to play with UNIX world as much as before. One weekend I decided to reanalyze SSP code again and this write-up is describing a few of my observations I’ve made during the work…
… which can be shortly summarized as:
Not security related…
C++ supports developers in object-orientated programming and removes from the developer the responsibility of dealing with many object-oriented programming (OOP) paradigm problems. But these problems do not magically disappear. Rather it is the compiler that aims to provide a solution to many of the complexities that arise from C++ objects, virtual methods, inheritance etc. At its best the solution is almost transparent for the developers. But beware of assuming or relying on ‘under-the-hood’ behavior. This is what I want to share in this post – some aspects of how compilers deal with C++ objects, virtual methods, inheritance, etc. At the end I want to describe a real-world problem that I analyzed recently, which I called a “pointer casting vulnerability”.
I had a pleasure to give a talk at the Confidence 2013 conference. This year conference was in Krakow (28-29th of May). The first CONFidence conference was organized in 2005 and from the beginning became one of the biggest security event in the Europe. Each year many speakers from all around the world attend to the conference. As you can realize schedule of the conference usually keeps high technical standards.
CONFidence is an annual IT security conference that will take place on 28-29th May, 2013 in Krakow. This is one of the biggest and most valuable conference in Central and East Europe. This event is famous not only from the good quality of presentations, but also (maybe most of all) from the great atmosphere of the conference itself and the after party
A lot of great speakers will attend to the conference this year. Details can be found here.
At the beginning I want to inform all my blog readers this post is in polish language because it refers to the situation in Poland.
In the second half of 2009 I was working in European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN). For some time I was part of GRID development team. One of our product was/is DPM server. What is DPM? LCG Disk Pool Manager (DPM) has been developed as part of the LCG project to provide a light-weight implementation of an SRM compliant Storage Element (SE). Since gLite 3.0 it is a standard gLite component, distributed and maintained as part of the gLite release.
DPM is a disk only SE, instead of a disk + MSS implementation like dCache or Castor. It may act as a replacement for the deprecated classic SE with the following advantages :
As some of you know I am(was) active developer in ERESI project. ERESI stands for The ERESI Reverse Engineering Software Interface, its web page stands at: www.eresi-project.org.
For those who do not know the project, The ERESI Reverse Engineering Software Interface is a multi-architecture binary analysis framework with a domain-specific language tailored to reverse engineering and program manipulation.
- Feature both user-mode and kernel-mode support for instrumentation, debugging and program analysis
- Handle INTEL and SPARC machine programs (partial support for ARM, MIPS and ALPHA processors).
As some of you know, I had problems with hard disk on my server (pi3.com.pl) which immediate cause problems with availability of my blog and personal site. Bad sectors appear in one of the partition. It took some time before hosting company replace it with new hard drive. Additionally I was waiting for almost one weak until defective drive will be sent to me for creating an image of last running correct system and next restore it. In the mean time I lost access to my private mail and so on… Anyway, finally server is back so I’m adding some pictures:
I haven’t been posting for a long time. One of the main reason of this situation was of course…. TIME. As some of you is aware I changed my job which involves form me a lot of time, energy, time, travelling, time, recruitment, time, closing old task and time
Last year I was working as security consultant in great consulting company Cigital. Some of you maybe know CTO – Gary McGraw. My main task as a Security Consultant at Cigital, was working at a large financial institution as part of the Application Security Architecture team. Working on many different projects alongside the development teams within the organization to ensure security is thought about at the requirements stage of the SDLC. Then I work with the development team throughout the development, testing and deployment phase to ensure the application is secure. From this short description you can realize it is mostly high management job compared what I was doing for my last years (research). I met a lot of great people there – mostly Greek “maphia” guys (greetings especially to Alexios and John :)) where we had a lot of fun not only at work Of course in company was working other great people which wasn’t Greek (greetings to David, Luca, James, Florence :)).
Anyway after a year I decided to come back to what I love (research) and this is the reason why I’m now at… Microsoft.
In the mean time I was discussing in many companies but MS was more flexible, openmind and “helpful” comparing to others that I decided to go there – especially they have section (group) which perfectly matches to my job preferences.